Varvara Panshina vs Zhenghua Xiao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Panshina vs Z. Xiao

Varvara Panshina
RUS
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
23
-
Height
-
569
C. Rank
805
561
Best Rank
805
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Zhenghua Xiao
CHN
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
23
-
Height
-
569
C. Rank
805
561
Best Rank
805
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Panshina 1 - 0 Xiao
They have played 2 sets in total, with Varvara Panshina winning 2 and Zhenghua Xiao winning 0. The last match between Varvara Panshina and Zhenghua Xiao was at the W35 Shenyang, 15-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Varvara Panshina getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Panshina | 1 |
| Xiao | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Shenyang(09-15-25)
Varvara Panshina
6
6
Zhenghua Xiao
1
3
V. Panshina vs Z. Xiao H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 68.04% (66-31) | Career Total W/L | 46.61% (55-63) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
V. Panshina vs Z. Xiao Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Varvara Panshina has won 39.29% of points on their second serve, while Zhenghua Xiao has won 40.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Varvara Panshina, in recent form, has won 51.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zhenghua Xiao has won 50.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.90% and 31.90% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Varvara Panshina has saved 49.70% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zhenghua Xiao has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Varvara Panshina has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 42/21), with Zhenghua Xiao winning 44.00% (W/L 11/14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Varvara Panshina has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 59/26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/3). Zhenghua Xiao has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 6/5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Varvara Panshina has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.59% of matches (W/L 24/10), where as Zhenghua Xiao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Varvara Panshina winning 1 times and Zhenghua Xiao being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Varvara Panshina winning 2 and Zhenghua Xiao winning 0.
- The last match between Varvara Panshina and Zhenghua Xiao was at the W35 Shenyang, 15-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Varvara Panshina getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:32.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Varvara Panshina has played against opponents with an average rank of 396.41 while Zhenghua Xiao has played against players with an average rank of 252.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Varvara Panshina has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zhenghua Xiao has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Varvara Panshina has converted 39.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zhenghua Xiao has converted 61.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Varvara Panshina vs Zhenghua Xiao Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. Panshina vs Z. Xiao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:25:32 | Average Match Time | 1:25:32 |
| 79% (38/48) | 1st Serve % | 60% (39/65) |
| 74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (22/39) |
| 50% (5/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (9/26) |
| 29% (5/17) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (34/65) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Panshina 46%, Xiao 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Panshina 57%, Xiao 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Panshina 54%, Xiao 61%.
V. Panshina Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 2-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 6-0 | ||
Z. Xiao Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(6) 4-6 14-12 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 1-6 12-10 | ||

V. Panshina vs Z. Xiao Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.04% (66/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.61% (55/63) |
| 62.73% (138/82) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.01% (118/133) |
| 55.96% (1108/872) | Games Win/Loss | 48.89% (1121/1172) |
| 69.41% (59/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.53% (47/54) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 195 | Aces Total | 176 |
| 0.44 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 422 | Total Double Faults | 337 |
| 1:40:32 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 361.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.71 |
| 58% (3179/5466) | 1st Serve % | 56% (2265/4034) |
| 64% (2030/3179) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1418/2265) |
| 45% (1036/2287) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (772/1769) |
| 49% (388/789) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (201/434) |
| 49% (2654/5470) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1753/4049) |
| 61.29% (19/12) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (21/28) |
| 71.21% (47/19) | Futures W/L | 49.28% (34/35) |
| 67% (64/95) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (52/112) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (7/16) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
| 69% (18/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 89% (57/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (54/51) |
| 11% (57/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (54/3) |
| 35% (40/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (64/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction11:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
18:20
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
18:25
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal